TACIT KNOWLEDGE SHARING AND ORGANIZATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS IN KENYA
Author: Julius Otundo
ABSTRACT
According to Choi &lee 2003, tacit knowledge is what is rooted in the mind and can be transferred in form of learning by doing and learning by watching. It can be completely tacit, semiconscious, or unconscious knowledge held in people’s heads and bodies (Leonard & Sensiper, 1998) Tacit knowledge can be classified into two dimensions: technical and cognitive (Pathirage et al., 2007). Technical encompasses information and expertise in relation to “know-how” while cognitive consists of mental models, beliefs, and values. Tacit knowing embodied in physical skills resides in the body’s muscles, nerves, and reflexes and is learned through practice. Tacit knowledge is also embodied in cognitive skills (Leonard & Sensiper, 1998). While explicit knowledge is easily exploitable, tacit knowledge is difficult to be extracted without the consent of the knowledge owner. Tacit knowledge is one of the strengths that an organization has that is more difficult to transfer or copy (Noteboom, 1993). In the resource-based theory, Hisrich et al. (2008) further highlight that in order for organizations to create unique resources which are rare, valuable, and non-immitigable; it has to exploit their internal knowledge. Many organizations in Kenya make use of intelligent solutions and business analytics to find new insights into their business processes and performance. Such insights are extracted through creativity and innovative methods to generate and gather large amounts of information about their clients, service providers, competitors, processes, procedures practices, and measures to produce substantial value. This has created a need for finding a suitable approach to tacit Knowledge sharing. This paper critically analyzes the deterrents of tacit knowledge sharing on Organization competitiveness. The study will also establish an understanding of how organizations can more easily share knowledge that will increase its performance, driven by an understanding of leveraging tacit knowledge.
Keywords: Tacit Knowledge, Explicit Knowledge, knowledge sharing, Organizational Competitiveness.
REFERENCES
Ang, J., Ashleigh, M., & Meyers, E. (2006, August). Knowledge sharing and team trustworthiness: it’s all about social ties. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 4(3), 175-186
Argote, L. (2013). Organizational learning creates, retains, and transfers knowledge. Heidelberg: Springer.
Barney, J.B. & Clark, D.N. (2007). Resource-Based Theory: Creating and Sustaining Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Competitive Advantage, OUP Oxford, U.K.
Chow, H. S. (2012). The Role of Social Network and Collaborative Culture in Knowledge Sharing and Performance Relations. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 24-37.
Ford, David, & Hakansson, HaKan. (2013). “Competition in Business Networks. (Report).” Industrial Marketing Management, 42.7 (2013): 1017-1024. Web
Hsieh, H. (2007). Organizational characteristics, knowledge management strategy, enablers, and process capability: Knowledge management performance in United States software companies. Ph.D. Dissertation, Lynn University, United States — Florida. Retrieved April 15, 2008, from ProQuest digital dissertations database. (Publication No. AAT 3256804).
Kucharska, W. (2017). Relationships between Trust and Collaborative Culture in The Context of TacitKnowledge Sharing. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management, and Innovation, 13(4), 61.
Lee, H. & Choi, B. (2003). Knowledge Management Enablers, Processes, and Organizational Performance: AnIntegrative View and Empirical Examination. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20 (1):179-228
Leonard, D. & S. Sensiper (1998). The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation. California Management Review, 40(3): 112-132.
Lin, C. (2007). To Share or Not to Share: Modeling Tacit Knowledge Sharing, Its Mediators and Antecedents. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(4), 411-428.
Nešić, Ana & Lalić, Danijela. (2016). The Impact of Trust on Job Performance in Organizations Management, 21(81), 27-34.
Nooteboom, B. (1999). Innovation, learning and industrial organization. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(2):127-150.
Noruzy, A., Dalfard, V., Azhdari, B., Nazari-Shirkouhi, S., & Rezazadeh, A. (2013). Relations betweentransformational leadership, organizational learning, knowledge management, organizational innovation,and organizational performance: an empirical investigation of manufacturing firms. International Journalof Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 64(5–8),
Peroune, D. L. (2007). Tacit knowledge in the workplace: the facilitating role of peer relationships. Journal ofEuropean Industrial Training, 31(4), 244-258
Radwanska, A. (2013). The Learning Organization Idea in the Context of Organizational Learning andKnowledge Management. Contemporary Management Quarterly / Wspólczesne Zarzadzanie, 12(4), 97–109
Randeree, E. (2006). Knowledge management: Securing the future. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(4), 145-156.
Reina (2006). Trust and Betrayal in the Workplace: Building Effective Relationships in Your Organization. Williston: Berrett-Koehler.
Wang, J., Ashleigh, M., & Meyers, E. (2006, August). Knowledge sharing and team trustworthiness: it’s all about social ties. Knowledge Management Research & Practice,4(3), 175-186.