THE ROLE OF SOCIAL WORK IN PROMOTING COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IN DECENTRALIZED GOVERNANCE SYSTEMS IN LIBERIA

Author: Joseph S. Kollie

ABSTRACT

The research draws on empowerment theory demonstrating the role of social work in transforming structural challenges through leadership development, critical consciousness-building and accountable institutions. . The study uses qualitative method and used interview as the data collection technique. The study used Semi-structured key informant interviews with 7 participants inclusive of 4 social workers, 1 county planning officer and 2 community leaders in Montserrado County, Liberia. Analysis of the findings of the study was done by utilizing thematic analysis. The findings reveal that social workers can assist marginalized groups demand accountability from decentralized units and facilitate the gathering of evidence by acting as intermediaries thereby enhancing oversight, responsiveness and social accountability towards good governance.

Keywords: Decentralization, Community Engagement, Social Work, Local governance, Citizen Participation

REFERENCE

  • Ackerman, J. M. (2004). Co-governance for accountability: beyond “exit” and “voice”. World development, 32(3), 447-463.
  • Avritzer, L. (2002). Democracy and the public space in Latin America. Princeton University Press.
  • Banks, S. (2020). Ethics, values and social work practice. Macmillan International Higher Education.
  • Beddoe, L. (2010). Social Work Theories and Methods. Australian Social Work, 63(4), 472–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407x.2010.522970)
  • Brittanie, Atteberry-Ash. (2022). Social Work and Social Justice: A Conceptual Review. Social Work, doi: 10.1093/sw/swac042
  • Chambers, R. (1994). The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World development, 22(7), 953-969.
  • Cornwall, A. (2002). Making spaces, changing places: situating participation in development (Vol. 170). IDS Working Paper.
  • Dickovick, J. T., & Riedl, R. B. (2010). Comparative assessment of decentralization in Africa: Final report and summary of findings. Washington, DC: United States Agency for International Development (USAID).
  • Elliot, Brennan., Seye, Abimbola. (2023). The impact of decentralisation on health systems in fragile and post-conflict countries: a narrative synthesis of six case studies in the Indo-Pacific. Conflict and Health, doi: 10.1186/s13031-023-00528-7
  • Falleti, T. G. (2005). A sequential theory of decentralization: Latin American cases in comparative perspective. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 327-346.
  • Fiala, N., & Premand, P. (2018). Social Accountability and Service Delivery: Experimental Evidence from Uganda. Social Accountability and Service Delivery: Experimental Evidence from Uganda. World Bank, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-8449
  • Fox, J. A. (2015). Social accountability: what does the evidence really say?. World Development, 72, 346-361.
  • Fredrick, Okoth, Otieno., Mercy, Mweni, Kathina., P., Gikonyo., Christine, Matindi., Susan., Muthoni, Nditi., Ike, Kitili. (2022). Promoting citizen participation for effective and accountable governance.   doi: 10.53555/ephhss.v8i11.1933
  • Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public administration review, 66, 66-75.
  • Gaventa, J., & Barrett, G. (2012). Mapping the outcomes of citizen engagement. World development, 40(12), 2399-2410.
  • Grindle, M. S. (2007). Going local: decentralization, democratization, and the promise of good governance. Princeton University Press.
  • Healy, K. (2014). Social work theories in context: Creating frameworks for practice. Macmillan International Higher Education.
  • Heller, P., Harilal, K. N., & Chaudhuri, S. (2007). Building local democracy: evaluating the impact of decentralization in Kerala, India. World Development, 35(4), 626-648.
  • IFSW (2018). Global Social Work Statement of Ethical Principles. Retrieved from: https://www.ifsw.org/global-social-work-statement-of-ethical-principles
  • Ilaria, Pitti. (2018). Unconventional Political Participation: An Overview.   doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-75591-5_2
  • Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: is it worth the effort?. Public administration review, 64(1), 55-65.
  • Isaac, P., Podah. (2019). Decentralization for delivering better health services in Liberia: lesson from the Philippines.  65-72. doi: 10.2991/EROPA-18.2019.8
  • Joshi, A., & Houtzager, P. P. (2012). Widgets or Watchdogs? Public Management Review, 14(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.657837
  • Laurence, Bherer., Pascale, Dufour., Françoise, Montambeault. (2023). What Is Informal Participation? International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, doi: 10.1007/s10767-022-09440-z
  • Lee, J. A. (2017). Liberia’s development strategy after the Ebola crisis. Foresight Africa: Top priorities for the continent 2017. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
  • Loftus, A. (2019). Political economy constraints on decentralization reform. Development Policy Review, 37, O12-O23.
  • Martinez-Vazquez, J., & Vaillancourt, F. (Eds.). (2011). Decentralization in developing countries: global perspectives on the obstacles to fiscal devolution. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Menocal, A. R. (2014). Getting real about politics: from thinking politically about politics to thinking politically about development. London: Overseas Development Institute.
  • Michels, A. (2011). Innovations in democratic governance: how does citizen participation contribute to a better democracy? International review of administrative sciences, 77(2), 275-293.
  • Michels, A., & De Graaf, L. (2010). Examining citizen participation: Local participatory policy making and democracy. Local Government Studies, 36(4), 477-491.
  • Midgley, J., & Conley, A. (Eds.). (2010). Social work and social development: Theories and skills for developmental social work. Oxford University Press, USA.
  • Nanda, P., Wijayanti., Matthew, S., Mingus. (2022). Decentralization and Citizen Perception of Prosperity in Indonesia. doi: 10.26740/jaj. v14n1.p80-94
  • Newig, J., & Kvarda, E. (2012). Participation in environmental governance: Legitimate and effective? In Environmental Governance: The Challenge of Legitimacy and Effectiveness (pp. 29–45). Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849806077.00010
  • Nilsson, M., & Kovacs, C. (2016). The capacity development results framework. Sida. (Otoo, S., Natalia, A., Behrens, J. (2009). The Capacity Development Results Framework. The World Bank, 1–94.) Replace with the text in the parenthesis
  • Nina, Maxwell. (2021). Using programme theory to identify the key elements of the Frontline programme. Social Work Education, doi: 10.1080/02615479.2021.1903415
  • Odugbemi, S., & Lee, T. (Eds.). (2011). Accountability through public opinion: From inertia to public action. World Bank Publications. Replace with this: (Peruzzotti, E. (2011). The Workings of Accountability: Contexts and Conditions. In Accountability through Public Opinion (pp. 53–64). The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/9780821385050_ch05)
  • Perkins, D. D., & Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Empowerment theory, research, and application. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 569–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506982
  • Porio, E. (2014). Decentralisation, power and networked governance practices in Metro Manila. Space and Polity, 18(1), 26-41.
  • Quick, K. S., & Bryson, J. M. (2016). Participatory governance. The SAGE handbook of governance, 517-538.
  • Richard, Lappin. (2019). Bridging the Capabilities–Expectations Gap: Lessons Learned from Post-Conflict Democracy Assistance to Liberia. Democracy and Security, doi: 10.1080/17419166.2018.1519801
  • Speer, P. W., & Peterson, N. A. (2000). Psychometric properties of an empowerment scale: Testing cognitive, emotional, and behavioral domains. Social Work Research, 24(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/24.2.109
  • Sultan, Amai, Gorontalo. (2022). Problems in the Implementation of Decentralization Policies in the Flagship Program “Nafas Cita” in Gorontalo Regency.   doi: 10.55657/tajis.v1i2.49
  • Tambulasi, R. I. C. (2009). All that glisters is not gold: New public management and corruption in Malawi’s local governance. Development Southern Africa, 26(2), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/03768350902899447
  • Tatiana, Lemos, de, Almeida, Mestriner. (2023). Social capital and governance of agricultural cooperatives.   doi: 10.4337/9781802202618.00015
  • Wahed, Waheduzzaman., Sharif, As-Saber., Mohotaj, Binte, Hamid. (2018). Elite capture of local participatory governance. Policy and Politics, doi: 10.1332/030557318X15296526896531
  • Woolcock, M. (2010). The rise and routinization of social capital, 1988-2008. Annual Review of Political Science, 13, 469–487. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.031108.094151
  • Work, R. (2002). Overview of decentralisation worldwide: A stepping stone to improved governance and human development. In 2nd International Conference on Decentralisation Federalism: The Future of Decentralizing States? (pp. 25-27).
  • Zastrow, C. H. (2019). Introduction to social work and social welfare. Cengage Learning. Replace with this: (Kirst-Ashman, K. K. (2010). Introduction to Social Work & Social Welfare: Critical Thinking Perspectives. Brooks/Cole, 513.)