INFORMAL FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT IN SINGING TEACHING: A QUALITATIVE STUDY IN MACAO

Authors: Tchiang Van Man Isabel, Qi Zixiang & Serra Sofia

ABSTRACT

This study explored informal formative assessment in singing teaching in Macao. Singing activities in Macao are conducted in three types of music classes: general music classes, choral classes, and solfege classes. This study applied structured observation, and ten music classes from middle one to three were observed through recordings. The results showed that: a) the frequency and type of learning targets and success criteria varied significantly across different types of classes; b) questioning and informal performance assessment were both applied, with the latter used exclusively for assessing singing performance; c) teachers provided all feedback verbally rather than in written form. Immediate feedback was given much more frequently than delayed feedback, and directive feedback was given much more frequently than facilitative feedback; d) strengths of teacher practice included the specificity of feedback and mode of delivery (e.g., demonstration through verbal or non-verbal means), while weaknesses related to questioning strategies, specificity and level of feedback, and peer assessment. By using observation, this study compensated for the inherent limitations of self-reported data (e.g., questionnaires and interviews) in previous studies, more objectively and completely revealing the practice of informal formative assessment in a specific sphere of music education.

Keywords: Informal, performance assessment, singing, observation

REFERENCE

  1. Allsup, R. E., & Baxter, M. (2004). Talking about music: Better questions? Better discussions! Music Educators Journal, 91(2), 29-33.
  2. Andrade, H. L. (2010). Students as the definitive source of formative assessment: Academic self-assessment and the self-regulation of learning. In Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 90-105). Routledge.
  3. Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (2011). Sequential analysis and observational methods for the behavioral sciences. Cambridge University Press.
  4. Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge university press.
  5. Bernard, C. F., & Abramo, J. M. (2019). Teacher evaluation in music: A guide for music teachers in the US. Oxford University Press.
  6. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: principles, policy & practice, 5(1), 7-74.
  7. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability (formerly: Journal of personnel evaluation in education), 21, 5-31.
  8. Brookhart, S. M. (2017). How to give effective feedback to your students. Ascd.
  9. Briggs, A., & Coleman, M. (2019). Research methodology in educational leadership and management. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education.
  10. Butler, R. (1987). Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation: Effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest, and performance. Journal of educational psychology, 79(4), 474.
  11. Cakir, I. (2010). Criticizing ourselves as teachers through observation: From reflective to effective teaching. English for Specific Purposes World, 9(30), 1-12.
  12. Chappuis, J., Stiggins, R. J., Chappuis, S., & Arter, J. (2020). Classroom assessment for student learning: Doing it right-using it well. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
  13. Clarke, S. (2014). Outstanding formative assessment: Culture and practice. Hachette UK.
  14. Cranmore, J., & Wilhelm, R. (2017). Assessment and feedback practices of secondary music teachers: A descriptive case study. Visions of research in Music Education, 29(1), 6.
  15. Creswell, J. (2016). Research in education: Design, conduct and evaluation of quantitative and qualitative research (Translated by Kouvarakou, N.). Ion (Year of Publication of the Original 2005), Athens.
  16. Denis, J. M. (2018). Assessment in music: A practitioner introduction to assessing students. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 36(3), 20-28.
  17. Dickey, M. R. (1992). A review of research on modeling in music teaching and learning. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 27-40.
  18. Direcção dos Serviços de Educação e Juventude. [DSEJ] (2015). The Requirements of Basic Academic Attainments (subject:Art Education- II.Music). http://www.dsedj.gov.mo/crdc/edu/BAA_primary/checklist/art_music_checklist_e.pdf
  19. Direcção dos Serviços de Educação e Juventude. [DSEJ] (2017a). Junior Secondary School Music Curriculum Guide. Retrieved from http://www.dsej.gov.mo/crdc/guide/data/junior/Music_guide_c.pdf
  20. Direcção dos Serviços de Educação e Juventude. [DSEJ] (2020). Student Assessment System for Formal Education of Local Education System. Retrieved from https://www.dsedj.gov.mo/~webdsej/www/edulaw/202007/download/Regulation_28_2020e.pdf
  21. Direcção dos Serviços de Educação e Juventude. [DSEJ] (2024). Student Assessment System for Formal Education of Local Education System. Retrieved from https://portal.dsedj.gov.mo/webdsejspace/site/ddca/index.jsp?con=requirements&
  22. Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing, 62(1), 107-115.
  23. Gallo, D. J. (2019). Formative assessment practices and children’s singing accuracy: A mixed methods inquiry. International Journal of Music Education, 37(4), 593-607.
  24. Green, S. K., & Hale, C. L. (2011). Fostering a lifelong love of music: Instruction and assessment practices that He a difference. Music Educators Journal, 98(1), 45-50.
  25. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), 81-112.
  26. Hattie, J., & Clarke, S. (2018). Visible learning: feedback. Routledge.
  27. Hodgen, J., & Marshall, B. (2005). Assessment for learning in English and mathematics: A comparison. Curriculum journal, 16(2), 153-176.
  28. Holcomb, A. (2019). Assessment practices of American choral music educators. The Oxford Handbook of Assessment Policy and Practice in Music Education, Volume 2, 379.
  29. Hsia, L. H., Huang, I., & Hwang, G. J. (2016). A web‐based peer‐assessment approach to improving junior high school students’ performance, self‐efficacy and motivation in performing arts courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(4), 618-632.
  30. Knoblauch, C. H., & Brannon, L. (1981). Teacher commentary on student writing: The state of the art. Freshman English News, 10(2), 1-4.
  31. Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications.
  32. Leahy, S., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Embedding formative assessment. London, UK: Specialist.
  33. Martin, L. (2020). Using synchronous formative feedback to facilitate student growth. Music Educators Journal, 107(2), 51-57.
  34. Mehan, H. (1979). ‘What time is it, Denise?”: Asking known information questions in classroom discourse. Theory into practice, 18(4), 285-294.
  35. McPherson, G. E., Davidson, J. W., & Faulkner, R. (2012). Music in our lives: Rethinking musical ability, development and identity. Oxford University Press.
  36. McPherson, G. E., Blackwell, J., & Hattie, J. (2022). Feedback in music performance teaching. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 891025.
  37. Moreno, R. (2004). Decreasing cognitive load for novice students: Effects of explanatory versus corrective feedback in discovery-based multimedia. Instructional science, 32(1), 99-113.
  38. Pellegrino, K., Conway, C. M., & Russell, J. A. (2015). Assessment in performance-based secondary music classes. Music Educators Journal, 102(1), 48-55.
  39. Sang, R. C. (1987). A study of the relationship between instrumental music teachers’ modeling skills and pupil performance behaviors. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 155-159.
  40. Scott, S. J. (2012). Rethinking the roles of assessment in music education. Music Educators Journal, 98(3), 31-35.
  41. Shaw, B. P. (2018). Music assessment for better ensembles. Oxford University Press.
  42. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of educational research, 78(1), 153-189.
  43. Tchiang, V. M. I. (2017). Teachers’ Perspective on the Macao Education Reform Policy. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 1309-1322.
  44. Tchiang, V. M. I. (2019). The Challenges for Teachers on the Implementation of Education Reform Policy in Macao. Paper presented at ISER-735th International Conference on Education and Social Science (ICESS-2019), Seoul, South Korea.
  45. Thompson, M., & Wiliam, D. (2007, April). Tight but loose: A conceptual framework for scaling up school reforms. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL.
  46. Wiliam, D. (2019). Embedded formative assessment. Solution tree press.
  47. Valle, C. (2015). Effects of criteria-referenced formative assessment on achievement in music. State University of New York at Albany.
  48. Valle, C., Andrade, H., Palma, M., & Hefferen, J. (2016). Applications of peer assessment and self-assessment in music. Music Educators Journal, 102(4), 41-49.