IMPLEMENTATION OF LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN HIGHER EDUCATION ENTITIES: STUDY AT MYKLASS MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY YOGYAKARTA

Authors: Bikorin, Siti Dyah Handayani & Nuryakin

ABSTRACT

The world of education is an entity greatly affected by technological developments, and universities are competing to present effective and efficient learning by accommodating the latest technology. A learning management system (LMS) or often known as the concept of e-learning, is a platform that is widely used to create effective online learning. The Muhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta has long developed the Myklass learning management system. This research uses two essential aspects of technology acceptance within an organization, the technology acceptance model (TAM). The concept of understanding is what supports describing the determinants of technology acceptance and is an organizational factor. The purpose of this study is to understand the extent to which the perception and application of Myklass technology by lecturers and students at UMY. Quantitative design with a case study method is an approach in this research. The sample was collected using a purposive sampling technique, permanent lecturers and students of at least the second semester of Myklass users at UMY. There are differences in the perception of technology acceptance between lecturers and students. Although the object is the same, namely Myklass, because each subject has a different understanding, the study results show differences between the two.

Keywords: Technology acceptance model (TAM), organizational factors, learning management system, and dyadic method.

REFERENCES

  • Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Prentice-Hall
  • Abid, R. N. (2019). Using Technology Acceptance Model ( TAM ) Model to Assess the Lecturers ’ Behavioral Intention to Use E-Learning System in the University of Babylon Using the Technology Acceptance Model ( TAM ) Model to Assess the Lecturers ’ Behavioral Intention to Use E – Lear. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(April), 956–963.
  • Alharbi, S., & Drew, S. (2014). Using the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding Academics’ Behavioural Intention to Use Learning Management Systems. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2014.050120
  • Analytics, G. (2022). Analytics Myklass UMY. https://analytics.google.com/analytics/web/?authuser=0#/report/defaultid/a160980691w225822507p213787397/overviewgraphOptions.selected=analytics.n hDay/
  • Ayele, A. A., & Birhanie, W. K. (2018). Acceptance and use of e ‑ learning systems : the case of teachers in technology institutes of Ethiopian Universities. Applied Informatics, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40535-018-0048-7
  • Bhattacherjee, A. (1998). Managerial influences on intraorganizational information technology use: A principal-agent model. Decision Sciences, 29(1), 139–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1998.tb01347.x
  • Chen Ying, L., Chih-Hsuan, T., & Wan-Chuan, C. (2015). The Relationship Between Attitude Toward Using And Customer Satisfaction With Mobile Application Services: An Empirical Study From The Life Insurance Industry. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 53(4), 194–200.
  • Davis, F D. (1985). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Management, Ph.D.(May), 291. https://doi.org/oclc/56932490
  • Davis, Fred D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  • Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: an Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, MA.
  • Ghozali, Imam. (2011). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM  SPSS19, Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
  • Haryono, S. (2017). Metode SEM untuk penelitian manajemen dengan AMOS LISREL PLS. Luxima Metro Media, 450.
  • Lee, H. Y., Lee, Y. K., & Kwon, D. (2005). The intention to use computerized reservation systems: The moderating effects of organizational support and supplier incentive. Journal of Business Research, 58(11 SPEC. ISS.), 1552–1561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.07.008
  • Lee, S. M., Kim, I., Rhee, S., & Trimi, S. (2006). The role of exogenous factors in technology acceptance: The case of object-oriented technology. Information and Management, 43(4), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.11.004
  • Marakarkandy, B., Yajnik, N., & Dasgupta, C. (2017). Enabling internet banking adoption: An empirical examination with an augmented technology acceptance model (TAM). Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 30(2), 263–294. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-10-2015-0094
  • Moon, J., & Kim, Y. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. 38(June 2000).
  • Talukder, M., & Quazi, A. (2010). Exploring the factors affecting employees’ adoption and use of innovation. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 16(2), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v16i2.594
  • Tucker, M., Jubb, C., & Yap, C. J. (2020). The theory of planned behaviour and student banking in Australia. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 38(1), 113–137. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-11-2018-0324
  • Usman, H., Mulia, D., Chairy, C., & Widowati, N. (2020). Integrating trust, religiosity and image into technology acceptance model: the case of the Islamic philanthropy in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-01-2020-0020