International Journal of Research in Education Humanities and Commerce

NATIONAL DISASTER MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION’S RISK COMMUNICATION IN GHANA: A CASE STUDY OF FLOOD AREAS IN ACCRA

Authors: Charles Hanson Adu & Lawrencia Agyepong

ABSTRACT

Risk communication is an integral part of any Risk Management process. This study reports on its importance, the medium, the approach used as well as the factors that influence risk communication in Accra, Ghana. Data obtained from residents through the administration of questionnaires in the flood-prone areas, as well as interviews with the National Disaster Management Organisation (NADMO), the institution mandated to manage the risk of flooding and other emergencies, brought out various issues on the risk communication process in Accra. This study finds that despite the perceived importance of risk communication in the risk management process, risk communication in Accra is hampered by ineffective regulations and a lack of trust by affected residents among other impediments. This research recommends that NADMO must increasingly use the radio as the main medium for conveying risk messages and that the organization must change its “top-down” risk communication approach into a more interactive one.

Keywords: Risk Communication, Risk Management, Floods, Accra, National Disaster Management Organization (NADMO).

REFERENCES

• Abunyewah, M., Gajendran T and Maund K. (2016). Influence of Risk Communication on intention to prepare for Flood Hazards in Informal Settlements. 6th International Conference on Building Resilience. Massey University: Paper No 49.
• Ahadzie, D. K., & Proverbs, D. (2011). Emerging Issues in the Management of Floods in Ghana. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, 1(2), 1-11.
• Ahadzie, D. K., Dinye, I., Dinye, R. D & Proverbs, D. G. (2016). Flood Risk Perception, Coping and Management in Two Vulnerable Communities in Kumasi, Ghana. Int. J. of Safety and Security Eng., 6(3): 538–549.
• Alaszewski, A. (2005). Risk communication: Identifying the Importance of SocialContext.Health Risk & Society, Vol. 7(2): 101-105.
• Amoako, C. & Boamah, E. F. (2014). The Three-dimensional Causes of Flooding in Accra, Ghana. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 7(1), 109-129.
• Ansah, S. O., Ahiataku, M. A., Yorke, C. K., Otu-Larbi, F., Bashiru, Y., Lamptey, P. N. L., and Tanu, M. (2020). Meteorological Analysis of Floods in Ghana. Advances in Meteorology, vol. 2020, Article ID 4230627.
• Asumadu-Sarkodie, S., Owusu, P. A., and Rufangura, P. (2015). Impact Analysis of Flood in Accra, Ghana. Advances in Applied Science Research, 6(9),53-78.
• Ballantyne, M. Paton, D. Johnston, D. Kozuch, M. and Daly, M. (2000). Information on Volcanic and Earthquake Hazards: The Impact on Awareness and Preparation. Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Limited Science Report No 2000/2.
• Bishop, B. Paton, D. Syme, G. and Nancarrow, B. (2000). Coping with Environmental Degradation: Salination as a Community Stressor.Network, 12: 1-15.
• Chess, C. Salomone, K.L. Hance, B.J. and Saville, A. (1995) A Results of a National Symposium on Risk Communication: Next Steps for Government Agencies.Risk Analysis, 15(2): 115-125.
• Covello, V.T. & Sandman, P. M. (2001) Risk Communication: Evolution and Revolution. In: Wolbarst, A, ed. Solutions to an Environment in Peril, Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press: (in Press): 164-178.
• Covello, V.T. (1998) Risk Perception, Risk communication, and EMF exposure: Tools and Techniques for Communicating Risk Information. In: Mattes R, Bernhardt J H, Repacholi MH, eds. Risk Perception, Risk Communication, and its application to EMF Exposure: Proceedings of the World Health Organization/ICNRP International Conference. (ICNIRP5/98) International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection: 179-214.
• Covello, V.T. McCallum, D.B. and Pavlova, M.T. (1989) Principles and Guidelines for Improving Risk Communication. In Covello, V.T. McCallum, D.B. Pavlova, M.T eds. Effective Risk Communications: The Role and Responsibility of Government and Non-government Organizations, Plenum Press: 3-16.
• Covello, V.T. Peter, R.G. Wojtecki, J, E. Hyde, R.C. (2001) Risk Communication. The West Nile Virus Epidemic, and Bioterrorism: Responding to the Communication Challenges Posed by the Intentional or Unintentional Release of a Pathogen in an Urban Setting.Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 78(2), 382-391.
• Doyle, L., Brady, A. M., & Byrne, G. (2009). An Overview of Mixed Methods Research. Journal of research in nursing, 14(2), 175-185.
• Duval, T.S. and Mulilis, J. P. (1999). A Person Relative – to Event (Pr E) Approach to Negative Threat Appeals and Earthquake Preparedness: A Field Study.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29: 485-516.
• Farmer, T, Robinson, K, Elliott, S.J. &Eyles, J. (2006). Developing and Implementing a triangulation protocol for qualitative health research. Qual Health Res vol. 16:377-94.
• Fischoff, B. (1989) Helping the Public Health Risk Decisions. In: Covello, V.T. McCallum, D.B. Pavlova, M.T. eds. Effective Risk Communication. The Role and Responsibility of Government and Non-government Organizations. Plenum Press; 111-116.
• Glik, D. (2007). Risk Communication for Public Health Emergencies. Annual review of public health, 28(1):  33-54. Health Protection Network (2008). Communicating with the Public about HealthRisks. Glasgow: Health Protection Scotland.
• Infanti, J., Sixsmith, J., Barry, M. M., Núñez-Córdoba, J., Oroviogoicoechea-Ortega, C. &Guillén-Grima, F. (2013). A Literature Review on Effective Risk Communication for the Prevention and Control of Communicable Diseases in Europe. ECDC. Inter- Departmental Liaison Group on Risk Assessment. (1998).Risk Communication: A Guide to Regulatory Practice.ILGRA.
• Iorfa, S.K.,Ottu, I.F.A.,Oguntayo, R.,Ayandele, O., Kolawole, S.O.,Gandi, J.C.,Dangiwa, A.L.&Olapegba, P.O. (2020). COVID-19 Knowledge, Risk Perception, and Precautionary Behavior Among Nigerians: A Moderated Mediation Approach. Frontiers inPsychology, 11, 3292.
• Johnson, D. W. (1999). Reaching Out: Interpersonal Effectiveness and Self-Actualization. Prentice-Hall.
• Lindell, M.K. & Whitney, D.J. (2000). Correlatives of Household Seismic Hazard Adjustment Adoption.Risk Analysis, 20(1), 13-25.
• Musah, B. A. N., & Akai, C. Y. (2014). Effects of flood disasters on livelihood coping mechanism in Tolon/Kumbumgu district of northern region of Ghana. International Journal of Agricultural Policy and Research, 2(1), 33-40.
• NADMO (National Disaster Management Organisation), (2010). National Standard Operating Procedures for Emergency Response. NADMO, Accra.
• Nathe, S., Gori, P., Greene, M., Lemersal, E. and Mileti, D. (1999). Public Education for Earthquake Hazards.Natural Hazards Informer. No. 2.
• Ologunorisa, T.E., (2009).  Content Analysis of HydroMeteorologicalNetwork in the Lower BenueRiver basin,  Nigeria.Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management. 13(2):  33-35.
• Otway, H.J. and Wynne, B. (1989). Risk Communication: Paradigm and Paradox. Risk Analysis. 9, 141-145.
• Palanchar, M. J. and Heath, R. L. (2002). Another Part of the Risk Communication Model: Analysis of Communication Processes and Message Content.Journal of Public Relations Research, 14(2): 127–158.
• Paton, D. (2000). Emergency Planning: Integrating Community Development, Community Resilience and Hazard Mitigation.Journal of the American Society of Professional Emergency Manager, 7, 109-118.
• Peter, R.G., Covello, V.T., McCallum, D.B. (1997). The Determents of Trust and Credibility in Environmental Risk Communication: An Empirical Study. Risk Analysis, 17 (1): 43-54.
• Rahman, F.N., Bhuiyan, M.A.A.,Hossen, K., Khan, H.T.A., Rahman, A.F.&Dalal, K. (2021). Challenges in Preventive Practices and Risk Communication towards COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Study in Bangladesh. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18, 9259.
• Rakow, T., Heard, C. L., & Newell, B. R. (2015). Meeting Three Challenges in Risk Communication: Phenomena, Numbers, and Emotions. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2(1), 147–156.
• Renn, O. and Levine, D. (1991). Credibility and Trust in Risk Communication. In: Kasperson and Stallen, Eds Communicating Risk to the Public. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Samaddar, S.,Yokomatsu, M., Dayour, F.,Oteng-Ababio, M.,Dzivenu, T. & Ishikawa, H. (2018). Exploring the Role of Trust in Risk Communication Among Climate-Induced Vulnerable Rural Communities in Wa West District, Ghana. In Strategies for Building Resilience against Climate and Ecosystem Changes in Sub-Saharan Africa, 247-264.
• Slovic, P. (1999). Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science: Surveying the Risk Assessment Battlefield. Risk Analysis, 19 (4): 689-701.
• Smith, K. (1993). Environmental Hazards; Assessing Risk and Reducing Disaster. Routledge.
• Stern, P.C. (1991). Learning Though Conflict: A Realistic Strategy for Risk Communication.Policy Sciences, 24: 99-119.
• Taylor‐Gooby, P. (2004). New SocialRisks in PostindustrialSociety: Some Evidence on Responses to ActiveLabourMarketPolicies from Eurobarometer. International Social Security Review,57 (3):  45-64.
• The University of Leicester, (2001). The Context of Organisational Health and Safety Risks, Unit 6, p33, Leicester.
• US National Research Council, (1989). Improving Risk Communication. National Academy Press.
• Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., &Bala, H. (2013). Bridging the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide: Guidelines for Conducting Mixed Methods Research in Information Systems. MIS quarterly, 37(1).
• Zimmerman, R., Carlos, E., Restrepo, A., Wendy, E. R., Alison, K., Ian, P. & George L. F. (2010). Risk communication for catastrophic events: results from focus groups. Journal of Risk Research, 13(7):  913-935.