THE IMPACT OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES ON INSTITUTIONAL MATURITY VIA CMMI

Authors: Dr. Wael Thabit & Nabila Abu Sharekh

ABSTRACT

Purpose: the ultimate aim of this paper is to highlight the impact of dynamic capabilities on institutional maturity at the NGOs in the southern Palestinian Governates.

Methodology: This paper was completed using a structured survey and the descriptive analytical approach. We targeted NGOs in the southern Palestinian governates with a capital of more than 2 million shekels, an age of organization is more than 15 years, and a staff of more than 30 people. To carry out this research, a stratified random sample of 346 employees with administrative tasks and responsibilities was chosen. The selected organization has a different field of work, Health, and Rehabilitation, Education, Social Development, Culture Women’s affairs, Youth and sport, and Endowment. SPSS version 26 was used to analyze the collected data.

Finding: the outcome of the research is twofold. the result revealed three types of dynamic capabilities for the maturity of the organization through the CMMI, reconfiguration capabilities namely sensing, seizing, and reconfiguration capabilities. CMMI helps to standardize the organization’s process to better performance operation. Dynamic capabilities have a positive effect on institutional maturity at the targeted NGOs in the Southern Palestinian Governates.

Practical implications: The findings have practical significance and draw managerial focus on the importance of (1) investing DCs, (2) CMMI e as significant factors in increasing institutional maturity

Keywords: Dynamic capabilities, Institutional maturity, CMMI

REFERENCES

  • Abu-Baker, M. I. K., Abu-Zaid, M. K. S., Alsawalqah, H., Al- Shamayleh, Y., & Al-Shboul, B. (2019). The Impact of the Implementation of Capability Maturity Model Integration on User Satisfaction: Case Study on Software Companies in Jordan. J. Softw., 14(7), 293-311.
  • Agenjo, E., Martín-Cruz, N., Ruiz-Martin, C., & López-Paredes, A. (2018). Does CMMI implementation affect the performance of the firm? An evaluation from a dynamic capabilities approach. International Journal of Production Management and Engineering, 6(2), 57-64.
  • Amit, R.; Schoemaker, P.J.H. (1993), “Strategic assets and organizational rent,” Strategic Management Journal, 14 (1): 33–46.
  • Ayyagari, M. R., & Atoum, I. (2019). CMMI-DEV Implementation Simplified. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 10.)4(
  • Ayyagari, M. R., & Atoum, I. (2019). CMMI-DEV Implementation Simplified. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 10.)4(
  • Baía, E. P., & Ferreira, J. J. (2019). Dynamic capabilities and performance: how has the relationship been assessed?. Journal of Management & Organization, 1-30.
  • Bujang, M. A., Omar, E. D., & Baharum, N. A. (2018). A review on sample size determination for Cronbach’s alpha test: a simple guide for researchers. The Malaysian journal of medical sciences: MJMS, 25(6), 85.
  • Buzzao, G., & Rizzi, F. (2021). On the conceptualization and measurement of dynamic capabilities for sustainability: Building theory through a systematic literature review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 135-175.
  • Dierickx, I., and Cool, K. (1989), “Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage,” Management Science, 35 (12): 1504-1511
  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they?. Strategic management journal, 21(10‐11), 1105-1121
  • Fabrizio, C. M., Kaczam, F., de Moura, G. L., da Silva, L. S. C. V., da Silva, W. V., & da Veiga, C. P. (2022). Competitive advantage and dynamic capability in small and medium-sized enterprises: A systematic literature review and future research directions. Review of Managerial Science, 16(3), 617-648. 12-
  • Feiler, P. H., & Humphrey, W. S. (1993, February). Software process development and enactment: Concepts and definitions. In [1993] Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Software Process-Continuous Software Process Improvement (pp. 28-40). IEEE.
  • Forstner, E., Kamprath, N., & Röglinger, M. (2014). Capability development with process maturity models–Decision framework and economic analysis. Journal of Decision Systems, 23(2), 127-150
  • Gökalp, E., & Martinez, V. (2021). Digital transformation capability maturity model enabling the assessment of industrial manufacturers. Computers in Industry, 132, 103522.
  • Gupta, S., Drave, V. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Baabdullah, A. M., & Ismagilova, E. (2020). Achieving superior organizational performance via big data predictive analytics: A dynamic capability view. Industrial Marketing Management, 90, 581-592.
  • Gutierrez-Gutierrez, L. J., Barrales-Molina, V., & Kaynak, H. (2018). The role of human resource-related quality management practices in new product development: A dynamic capability perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management.
  • Hu, J., & Gao, S. (2019). Research and application of capability maturity model for Chinese intelligent manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 83, 794-799.
  • Iqbal, J., Khan, M., & Minhas, N. M. (2018). Are project managers informally following capability maturity model integration practices for project management?. Global Journal of Information Technology: Emerging Technologies, 8(3), 86-94.
  • Kerzner, H. (2019). Using the project management maturity model: strategic planning for project management. John Wiley & Sons
  • Khan, O., Daddi, T., & Iraldo, F. (2020). Microfoundations of dynamic capabilities: Insights from circular economy business cases. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1479-1493 .
  • Kosieradzka, A. (2017). Maturity model for production management. Procedia Engineering, 182, 342-349.
  • Kostiukevych, R., Mishchuk, H., Zhidebekkyzy, A., Nakonieczny, J., & Akimov, O. (2020). The impact of European integration processes on the investment potential and institutional maturity of rural communities. Economics & Sociology, 13(3), 46-63.
  • Laaksonen, O., & Peltoniemi, M. (2018). The essence of dynamic capabilities and their measurement. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(2), 184-205.
  • Lasrado, L. A. (2018). Set-Theoretic Approach to Maturity Models. Frederiksberg: Copenhagen Business School (CBS).
  • Lee, J. C., & Chen, C. Y. (2019). Exploring the determinants of software process improvement success: A dynamic capability view. Information Development, 35(1), 6-20
  • Lookman, K., Pujawan, N., & Nadlifatin, R. (2022). Measuring innovative capability maturity model of trucking companies in Indonesia. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2094854
  • Mihajlović, M., Tadić, J., & Jotić, J. (2021). Implementation of quality management system and the level of maturity of the company in the dairy industry of Serbia. Ekonomika, 67(3), 63-74.
  • Mikalef, P., Boura, M., Lekakos, G., & Krogstie, J. (2019). Big data analytics capabilities and innovation: the mediating role of dynamic capabilities and moderating effect of the environment. British Journal of Management, 30(2), 272-298.
  • Pandey, P., & Pandey, M. M. (2021). Research methodology tools and techniques. Bridge Center.
  • Paulk, M. C. (2009). A history of the capability maturity model for software. ASQ Software Quality Professional, 12(1), 5-19.
  • Paulk, M. C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M. B., & Weber, C. V. (1993). Capability maturity model, version 1.1. IEEE software, 10(4), 18-27.
  • Rialti, R., Marzi, G., Ciappei, C., & Busso, D. (2019). Big data and dynamic capabilities: a bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review. Management Decision, 57(8), 2052-2068.
  • Sabahi, S., & Parast, M. M. (2020). Firm innovation and supply chain resilience: a dynamic capability perspective. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 23(3), 254-269.
  • Sabahi, S., & Parast, M. M. (2020). Firm innovation and supply chain resilience: a dynamic capability perspective. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 23(3), 254-269.
  • Singh, A., & Gill, S. S. (2020). Measuring the maturity of Indian small and medium enterprises for unofficial readiness for capability maturity model integration‐based software process improvement. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 32(9), e2261.
  • Teece. D.J., Pisano G and Shuen A. (1997), “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management,” Strategic Management Journal, 18 (7):509–53
  • Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International journal of medical education, 2, 53.
  • Teece, D. J. (2014), “A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise,” Journal of International Business Studies, 45 (1), 8-37.
  • Teece, D. J. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and entrepreneurial management in large organizations: Toward a theory of the (entrepreneurial) firm. European Economic
  • Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long range planning, 51(1), 40-49
  • Teece, D.J. (2007), “Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature microdonations of (sustainable) enterprise performance,” Strategic Manage Journal, 28(13):1319
  • Weking, J., Böttcher, T. P., Hermes, S., & Hein, A. (2019, June). Does Business Model Matter for Startup Success? A Quantitative Analysis. In ECIS. 43-   Wetering, R., Mikalef, P., & Pateli, A. (2017). A strategic alignment model for IT flexibility and dynamic capabilities: toward an assessment tool.
  • Yang, Y., Yang, M., Shen, C., Wang, F., Yuan, J., Li, J., … & Liu, Y. (2020). Evaluating the accuracy of different respiratory specimens in the laboratory diagnosis and monitoring the viral shedding of 2019-nCoV infections. MedRxiv, 2020-02.