INVESTIGATING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGIES IN GENERATING LVAR

Author: Stavroula Patsiomitou

ABSTRACT

The current study emphasizes the significance of digital media and Artificial Intelligence (AI) in developing innovative approaches to concept introduction. The study centers on an educational experiment aimed at investigating AI technologies, including ChatGPT, Leonardo.AI, Lumen5.AI, and Pictory.AI, in the creation of Linking Visual Active Representations. This involves the integration of verbal text with both virtual static content and interactive video elements. Additionally, the study introduces the revised Bloom’s taxonomy, which acts as a framework for evaluating the educational experiment carried out with these AI tools. An analysis of a dialogue generated by ChatGPT is conducted through the lens of Bloom’s theory, resulting in the finding that ChatGPT not only applies Bloom’s framework but also incorporates various theoretical perspectives from didactics, pedagogy, and psychology to develop quizzes and dialogues. The extensive educational experiment will facilitate the extraction of insights regarding how ChatGPT utilizes theoretical frameworks to formulate questions and foster subsequent discussions among students and educators, stemming from a series of increasingly complex prompts.

Index Terms– Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies, Linking Visual Active Representations, The revised Bloom’s taxonomy.

REFERENCES

  • Anastasiades, P. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Pilot study to explore teachers’ views in Greece. Proceedings of the World Research Society International Conference, October 21 – 22, 2023 Zarqa, Jordan.
  • Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives—Complete edition. New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
  • Barwise, J., & Etchemendy, J. (1991). Visual information and valid reasoning. In W. Zimmerman & S. Cunningham (Eds.), Visualization in teaching and learning mathematics (pp. 9-24). Washington, DC: Math. Assoc. of America
  • Bloom, B. S.,Engelhart,M. D.,Furst,E. J.,Hill,W. H.,& Krathwohl,D. R. (Eds.).(1956). Taxonomy of educational objectivities: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay
  • Cardona, M. A., Rodriguez, R. J. & Ishmael K. 2023. “Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Teaching and Learning: Insights and Recommendations.” U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology, Washington, DC, May 2023.
  • Diezmann, C. M. (2000). The difficulties students experience in generating diagrams for novel problems. In T. Nakahara & M. Koyama (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 241-248). Hiroshima, Japan: PME.
  • Diezmann, C. M. (2005) Primary students’ knowledge of the properties of spatially-oriented diagrams In Chick, H. L. & Vincent, J. L. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 281-288). Melbourne: PME.
  • European Commission: Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture. (2022). Ethical guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and data in teaching and learning for educators. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/153756.
  • Finke, R. A. (1990). Creative imagery: Discoveries and inventions in visualization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
  • Gamow, G. (1988). One, two, three–infinity. New York: Dover Publications. (Original work published 1947)
  • Glaser, BG., Strauss, Al. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research New York: Aldine de Gruyter
  • İpek, Z.H., Gözüm, A.İ.C., Papadakis, S., & Kallogiannakis, M. (2023). Educational Applications of the ChatGPT AI System: A Systematic Review Research. Educational Process: International Journal, 12(3): 26-55.
  • Liao, Shen-yi, and Tamar Gendler. 2020. “Imagination.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2020 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/imagi nation/
  • Manning, C. (2020). Artificial Intelligence Definitions. Stanford University. https://hai.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/2020-09/AI-Definitions-HAI.pdf
  • Marzano, R., & Kendall, J. (2007). The new taxonomy of educational objectives (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • McCarthy, J., M. Minsky, N. Rochester, and C. Shannon (31 August 1955). A proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence. http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/history/dartmouth.html
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2014). Principles to Actions: Ensuring Mathematics Success for All. Reston, VA: pp.36-37. https://www.nctm.org/uploadedFiles/Conferences_and_Professional_ Development/Institutes /Supporting_Students_Productive_Struggle/ Session5 – 3-5.pdf
  • Osborn, A.F. (1963) Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem solving (3rd Revised Edition). New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
  • Passmore, J. (1985). Recent philosophers: A supplement to a hundred years of philosophy. NY: Duckworth.
  • Patsiomitou, S., (2008a). The development of students’ geometrical thinking through transformational processes and interaction techniques in a dynamic geometry environment. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology journal, 5, 353-393. Available on line http://iisit.org/IssuesVol5.htm
  • Patsiomitou, S. (2008b) Linking Visual Active Representations and the van Hiele model of geometrical thinking. In Yang, W-C, Majewski, M., Alwis T. and Klairiree, K. (Eds.)  Proceedings of the 13th Asian Conference in Technology in Mathematics. pp 163-178. ISBN 978-0-9821164-1-8. Bangkok, Thailand: Suan Shunanda Rajabhat University. 15-19 DECEMBER 2008 Available on line  https://atcm.mathandtech.org/EP2008/papers_full/2412008_14999.pdf
  • Patsiomitou, S. (2010). Building LVAR (Linking Visual Active Representations) modes in a DGS environment. Electronic Journal of Mathematics and Technology (eJMT), ISSN1933-2823, Issue 1, Vol. 4.  pp. 1-25.
  • Patsiomitou, S. (2019a). From Vecten’s Theorem to Gamow’s Problem: Building an Empirical Classification Model for Sequential Instructional Problems in Geometry. ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online).  International Institute for Science, Technology and Education (IISTE): E-Journals. Journal of Education and Practice. Vol.10, No.5, pp.1-23. DOI: 10.7176/JEP/10-5-01
  • Patsiomitou, S. (2019b). Hybrid-dynamic objects: DGS environments and conceptual transformations. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies. Vol. 1, No. 1, May 2019, pp. 31-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v1i1.1416.
  • Patsiomitou, S. (2019c). A Trajectory for the Teaching and Learning of the Didactics of Mathematics    [using ICT]: Linking Visual Active Representations. Monograph. Published by Global Journal Incorporated. United States. (September 5, 2019). ISBN: 978-1-7340132-0-7. http://doi.org/10.34257/SPatTrajICT
  • Patsiomitou, S. (2021a). Dynamic Euclidean Geometry: pseudo-Toulmin modeling transformations and instrumental learning trajectories. International Institute for Science, Technology and Education (IISTE): E-Journals. Journal of Education and Practice. ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online). 12 (9). pp. 80-96. DOI: 10.7176/JEP/12-9-09. Publication date: March 31st 2021.
  • Patsiomitou, S. (2021b). A Research Synthesis Using Instrumental Learning Trajectories: Knowing How and Knowing Why. Information and Knowledge Management. ISSN 2224-5758 (Paper) ISSN 2224-896X (Online). 11(3). DOI: 10.7176/IKM/11-3-02. Publication date: April 30th 2021
  • Patsiomitou, S. (2023). A brief review on my studies: managing the complexity on using Linking Visual Active Representations (LVAR) International Journal of Scientific and Management Research Volume 6 Issue 05 (May) 2023, pp.  1-33.  http://doi.org/10.37502/IJSMR.2023.6501
  • Patsiomitou, S. (2024). The influence of artificial intelligence and digital media on the evaluation of school units and the enhancement of educational quality. 3rd International Scientific Conference of the Hellenic Educational Evaluation Society (in press).
  • Peirce, C. S. (1906). Prolegomena to an apology of pragmaticism. In J. Hoopes (Ed.), Peirce on signs: Writings on semiotics by Charles Sanders Peirce (pp. 249-252). Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press
  • Punie, Y., editor(s), Redecker, C., European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu , EUR 28775 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2017, ISBN 978-92-79-73718-3 (print),978-92-79-73494-6 (pdf), doi:10.2760/178382 (print),10.2760/159770 (online), JRC107466. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC107466
  • Rapaport, W. (2020). What Is Artificial Intelligence? https://cse.buffalo.edu/~rapaport/Papers/wang.pdf
  • Rossi, F. et al. (2018). A definition of Artificial Intelligence: main capabilities and scientific disciplines. High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. https://www.pcci.gr/evepimages/0101_F483.pdf
  • Sabzalieva, E., & Valentini, A. (2023). ChatGPT and artificial intelligence in higher education: Quick start guide. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385146
  • Skinner, B. F. (1958). Teaching machines. Science, 128, 969–977. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.128.3330.969. Retrieved from https://app.nova.edu/toolbox/instructionalproducts/edd8124/fall11/1958-Skinner-TeachingMachines.pdf
  • P.M. van Hiele (1986). Structure and Insight. A Theory of Mathematics Education, Academic Press, Orlando, FL
  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
  • Vygotsky, L.S. (1934/1962). Thought and language. MIT Press