WHY UTILIZATION OF INFRASTRUCTURAL RESOURCES IS KEY IN TEACHING AND ACHIEVEMENT OF LEARNING OUTCOMES IN BIOLOGY: THE KENYAN EXPERIENCE

Authors: Ms. Roseline Moraa Osugo, Dr. Ephantus M. Kaugi & Dr. Charles M. Magoma

ABSTRACT

This article examines the extent to which both teachers and learners utilize infrastructural resources to support the development of scientific understanding in Biology, particularly through visualization of abstract concepts, hypothesis generation, critical analysis, and reflective critic aimed at deepening comprehension. Further, the article assesses the extent to which utilization of infrastructural resources in Biology teaching and learning influences the achievement of learning outcomes in public secondary schools in Nairobi County, Kenya. Adopting a mixed-methods approach within an explanatory sequential design, the research commenced with a quantitative survey followed by in-depth qualitative inquiry in selected secondary schools, informed by the survey results. The study was conducted in Nairobi City County, encompassing 114 public secondary schools. Data collection tools included structured questionnaires, in-depth interview schedules, focus group discussion (FGD) guides, and classroom observation protocols. Participants comprised Biology teachers, students and subject matter experts from the Kenya Institute of Curriculum Development (KICD), the Centre for Mathematics, Science and Technology Education in Africa (CEMASTEA), and Biology education lecturers from Kenyatta University. The findings reveal that the use of infrastructural resources in Biology was limited and primarily facilitated the development of lower-order cognitive abilities, basic scientific process skills, and a generally negative attitude towards the subject. Thus, there is need to expand and diversify the use of infrastructural resources so as to enhance the quality and depth of Biology education.

Keywords:  infrastructure, infrastructural resources, teaching, achievement, learning outcomes, Biology and Kenya

REFERENCES

  • Alade, S. O., & Iwu-James, J. (2018). Library use as predictor of academic performance in Biology   among senior secondary school students in Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 9(6), 1-5.
  • Arya P., Christ T., and Chiu M. M (2016). Relations among Resources in Professional Learning Communities and Learning Outcomes. Teacher Education. Routledge Taylor& Francis group
  • Creswell, J.W., (2014). Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative and Mixed Approaches. University of Nebraska Linkon. Sage London/Delhi/Singapore/Washington.
  • Etobro B. A and F E. O (2017). Students’ Perceptions of Difficult Concepts in Biology in Senior Secondary Schools in Lagos State. Global Journal of Educational Research vol 16, 2017: 139-147 Copyright© bachudo science co. Ltd printed in nigeria. Issn w1596-6224 Www.globaljournalseries.com; info@globaljournalseries.com
  • Morselli, F., & Hand, B. (2018). The effectiveness of visualizations in Biology education: A review of literature. Journal of Biological Education, 52(1), 17-28.
  • Mwamba N.M and Kabunga N. (2018). A comparison of Biology Curriculum Implementation in Upgraded and Old established Secondary Schools in Ndola District of Zambia. Zabia Journal of Teacher Professional Growth (ZTPG) 4:2 pp 1-18
  • Namasaka, F. W., Mondoh, H. O., & Wasike CB. (2017). Effects of Sequential Teaching Methods on Retention of Knowledge in Biology by Secondary School Students in Kenya. European Journal of Educational Studies Vol 3 No.5 pp 716-734. DOI 10.5281/zenodo. 574666
  • NGSS, (2013). Next generation science standards: for states, by states. Washington: National Academies Press. OECD, (2012). Education at a Glance 2012: OECD Indicators. Corrigenda to OECD publications
  • Rapholo, S., Lelliott, A., & Rauscher, W. (2018). The effects of computer simulations on high school Biology students’ understanding of complex biological concepts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(1), 119-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9772-x
  • Rosenthal, J. L. (2018). Teacher candidates in the garden. Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas, 55(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00368121.2017.1403875
  • Solheim, J., Berg, C., Nerland, M., & Manger, T. (2017). Investigating the impact of aquarium visits on student attitudes toward science, nature, and the environment. Journal of Environmental Education, 48(1), 26-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2016.1210574
  • Stregar, J. M., Schussler, E. E., Lee, M. M., & Martin, M. (2019). Botanical gardens as a tool for science learning: Investigating the impact of a botanical garden visit on middle school students’ knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors towards plants and the environment. Journal of Environmental Education, 50(4), 229-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2018.1527812
  • Sugimoto, M., Tsukagoshi, K., & Nishida, T. (2017). Use of a Biology television program to promote students’ interest in and understanding of Biology in Japanese high schools. International Journal of Science Education, 39(17), 2277-2296. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1384412
  • Timms, M. J., Moyle, K., Weldon, P. R., & Mitchell, P. (2018). Challenges in STEM learning in Australian schools: Literature and policy review. Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER). https://research.acer.edu.au/policy_analysis_misc/28
  • Widodo, A. and Agustin R. (2016). Explaining the Implementation of Biology Teacher Education Curriculum through Productive Pedagogy Framework. Conference paper 2017. Research Gate.  World Bank, (2015). Kenya’s Educational achievement and challenges. New York.